The road of this research is composed of: (a) the designing of research proposal, (b) the clarification of the objectives of data collecting, (c) formulating key words for the research, (d) the classification of references, (e) data collecting, (f) data consistency and data stability, (g) data classification, (g) data analysis, (h) research report. The secondary readings of works offering the description or just any explanation of aequitas concerning the approaches carry points of view and core questions that vary.
The primary readings refer to the collections of the works of philosophy which will help this research describe, disentangle, clarify, and build thorough images of “triune concept”: legal hermeneutics-the ultimate telos-the interpretation in law and the imaginary romanticism assumed to bind the three categories into the vertical work relationship. This is a qualitative research with almost all of its steps having been processed and completed solemnly, richly, and incisively within the groove of procedural intersection by the skeptics-dialectics-argumentative-abstractive ways which takes the name of the “library-based studies.” The method of data collecting, therefore, will focus more on the inventing of library-based resources of those that have been published and those have not-so long as they go with the key words employed.
#Whatever it takes in latin full#
This system is not only hyper-expressive, hyper-sensitive, hyper-romantic-sentimentalist, hyper-predictable, full of charisma/charismatic (from the point of view of those seeking for justice), but also malignant, wild, cruel, and ferocious, as well as a deadly and terrible fright (form the perspective of the partially subjective of the detrimentors).
#Whatever it takes in latin how to#
This theological revelation becomes more valuable for the management of legal practices, for at its final threshold it will enable “the politics of judiciary” to access a system of law enforcement which is not only stabile, strong/solid, and well-shaped from the perspective of how to look at “the politics of judiciary,” but even more, this system will always be worshiped, adored, and glorified by the science, history, or by the spiritual ambience of human society.
A LEGAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE: AEQUITAS AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE UPHOLDING OF PROPRIETY VALUE OF JUDICIAL VERDICTS Herman Bakir, Joko Siswanto,1 Mukhtasar Syamsuddin,2 ABSTRACT The research for dissertation which is entitled “The Meaning of Aequitas in The Legal Hermeneutics Perspective and Its Contribution to The Upholding of Propriety Value of Judicial Verdicts” exclusively prepared to accumulate the paradigm in the discipline of legal hermeneutics, especially from the perspectives of the ramification of the core question which is, “what and how is the ultimate telos which will have been used by every piece of temporary legal interpretation (it is) vis-a-vis the day-to-day problem regarding the employment of one or more legal norms applicable to a specific case?” This mechanism carries an important value given that what has been attempted with this is about the composition of a system of “universal knowledge,” namely: The structure/anatomy of a judge’s decision calculated/measured/weighed with the utmost justness, accurateness, and truth.
0 kommentar(er)
